Author Topic: Diaboł's WIP  (Read 30764 times)

Offline Diaboł

  • TOSEC Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Diaboł's WIP
« Reply #90 on: April 11, 2011, 12:24:52 PM »
Atari ST - Demos - [ST] (TOSEC-v2011-04-11_WIP), Atari ST - Diskmags - [ST] (TOSEC-v2011-04-11) and Atari ST - Compilations - Demos (TOSEC-v2011-04-11) ready and uploaded. As usual a lot of changes + new files. Five files have been moved from Demos [ST]:

Toxic Mag 1 (1991-10)(European Swapping Crew) renamed to Toxic Magazine 01 (1990-10)(TSB)[a4] and moved to Diskmags [ST]
Toxic Mag 1 (1991-10)(European Swapping Crew)[a] renamed to Toxic Magazine 01 (1990-10)(TSB)[a5] and moved to Diskmags [ST]

TSB Compil 2 (19xx)(T.S.B.) renamed to TSB Compil 02 (19xx)(Storm Brothers) and moved to Compilations - Demos
TSK CD 15 (19xx)(-) renamed to TSK CD 15 (19xx)(TSK) and moved to Compilations - Demos
Vieille Demos (1988)(Skyrace) moved to Compilations - Demos

Offline Diaboł

  • TOSEC Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Diaboł's WIP
« Reply #91 on: April 12, 2011, 06:05:54 PM »
I just compared Atari ST - Compilations - Demos & Atari ST - Demos - [ST]. There's about 80 duplicates. Detailed list attached.

Offline Diaboł

  • TOSEC Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Diaboł's WIP
« Reply #92 on: April 17, 2011, 12:03:27 PM »
Checking demos from Atari ST - Demos - [ST]  is almost done. I want to split it into a few DATs. Here are the names:

  • Atari ST - Demos - BBStros
  • Atari ST - Demos - Cracktros
  • Atari ST - Demos - Intros
  • Atari ST - Demos - Invitations
  • Atari ST - Demos - Music Disks
  • Atari ST - Demos - Slideshows
  • Atari ST - Demos - Various

Offline Cassiel

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
    • Email
Re: Diaboł's WIP
« Reply #93 on: April 19, 2011, 12:49:33 AM »
Do we really need it that granular for ST demo's?   :-\

Offline Diaboł

  • TOSEC Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Diaboł's WIP
« Reply #94 on: April 19, 2011, 06:29:27 AM »
Personally I don't need it... I think it's OK now but I thought I could ask and see what people want since some demos on some platform are done this way. I guess I could express that  better in the last post  :P

Offline Cassiel

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
    • Email
Re: Diaboł's WIP
« Reply #95 on: April 21, 2011, 12:08:14 PM »
Hmmmm... personally I think it best to avoid going to that lower level. I know we have for some big ‘collections’ (i.e. thousands/tens of thousands), but they usually the exception to the rule……

Understand it’s unavoidable for some systems (like C64) but not sure we should split that was just for the sake of it.

Offline Diaboł

  • TOSEC Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Diaboł's WIP
« Reply #96 on: April 21, 2011, 04:35:15 PM »
Everything's clear. Thx Cassiel.