TOSECdev Forum

TOSEC Project => TOSEC ISO => Topic started by: NLS on April 03, 2018, 09:16:11 AM

Title: SCOOPEX collection Amiga CD/CD32/CDTV
Post by: NLS on April 03, 2018, 09:16:11 AM
In latest release I found a few images that are also in SCOOPEX collection.
Does this mean that inserting the rest is a work in progress?

Links for reference:

LINKS REMOVED. PLEASE DO NOT POST LINKS TO BINARIES/COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL IN THIS FORUM.
Title: Re: SCOOPEX collection Amiga CD/CD32/CDTV
Post by: tomse on April 03, 2018, 09:40:44 AM
That is correct :-)

And if you have more that isn't in TOSEC yet, feel free to contact us with it :-)
Title: Re: SCOOPEX collection Amiga CD/CD32/CDTV
Post by: NLS on April 03, 2018, 09:44:18 AM
Great!

Found several ISO images that are not yet in NEC TGFX16 yet here:
https://edgeemu.net/browse-tg16cd.htm (https://edgeemu.net/browse-tg16cd.htm)
(and many that already are)

Not sure about the rest of the files in that site.

Yes not Commodore ISO (which I am more interested like you), but still interesting to inform the appropriate maintainer (is there one?).
Actually is there a list of who to contact about what?
Title: Re: SCOOPEX collection Amiga CD/CD32/CDTV
Post by: tomse on April 03, 2018, 10:26:38 AM
Creating a new topic with the named computers/consoles is probably the best way of contact :-)
but I'll mention your post to the group
Title: Re: SCOOPEX collection Amiga CD/CD32/CDTV
Post by: Maddog on April 03, 2018, 11:53:42 AM
Thanks for the information. Actually we have more sources than time to add them usually but we'll get around to them in the long run.  :)

I also removed your Mega links. While I realise you were just trying to help, Tosecdev does not endorse or allow distribution of binaries that are copyrighted in our forum. There are other places for that. Thanks for your understanding.
Title: Re: SCOOPEX collection Amiga CD/CD32/CDTV
Post by: NLS on April 03, 2018, 01:53:36 PM
I understand all points. Fair.


BTW, I believe collections by organized groups (like Scoopex or BS1) should have priority over random findings.
(just my 0.5)


Let me know if I can help.