OK.
I share a processs to help for have correct naming, so that's why I separate file.
This is not official TOSEC.
It's just more confortable to work for me.
Juste have more than 33.000+ files to analyse.... long work.
Maddog is true. How to evaluate.
For [XXX] the best way is to add something like it exist for game content classification :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_content_rating_systemlike [18+]
Adapted from the original publication with the country.
I'm french and we have PEGI
So for a french production this will [PEGI 18], lot's of french production on Amstrad.
[PEGI 18] at the end of the name file.
Another way.
Slideshow ?
Where to put them, no game, no utilities, etc...
It's slideshow.
I suggest a DAT file for that.
Music.
Same Slideshow.
The DSK are just like a JukeBoxe.
Fanzine DSK
Same, they are "Digital Publication".
Not PIX. They are not PDF (or any other, txt, epub...)
Need also a separate dat file.
Books Content.
Compilation or Game or ?
Name of the book (it's seem that's current for what I've).
I've a DAT for that too, but for Work process.
Ex for book :
"Hacia la inteligencia artificial con Amstrad (1985)(Indescomp S.A.)(ES)(es)[bug].dsk"
Extremly rare DSK.
Magazines content.
Same books.
I've a DAT for that too, for work process.
Robot PD.
Need an external file for those who search for something.
But, some Robot PD are just simple copy of other publication.
Ex:
No 10200 Artificial intelligence
It's a compilation of "AI" programme like ELiza.
Ok for Compilation made by Robot PD.
Probably need to be renamed
Artificial Intelligence - Robot PD 10200 (19xx)...
like
XXXXX - issue NN ()....
19000 to 19311
They are just a redistribution of Fanzine (see above).
24200
XLisp, redistribution.
etc.
Work in progress.
Thx.